<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Review of ProofHQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/</link>
	<description>A Resource For All Things Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-45523</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-45523</guid>
		<description>I have used almost every proofing application on the web be it Proofhq, Conceptshare or ProofHub.Proofhq is easy to use but sharing becomes difficult if u are not using Basecamp.

Personally for quick and easy reviews i find ProofHub the best. Give it a try. 
Here it is: http://www.proofhub.com/mini</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used almost every proofing application on the web be it Proofhq, Conceptshare or ProofHub.Proofhq is easy to use but sharing becomes difficult if u are not using Basecamp.</p>
<p>Personally for quick and easy reviews i find ProofHub the best. Give it a try.<br />
Here it is: <a href="http://www.proofhub.com/mini" rel="nofollow">http://www.proofhub.com/mini</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Baptiste</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-23386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Baptiste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-23386</guid>
		<description>Hi guys!

First let me say congrats to both @scott and @mat, you have really amazing products guys (and great ways of managing communication, community...)

So I&#039;m the cofounder of a small but nice French startup and we are doing UpShot (http://upshotapp.com).
It&#039;s kind of half a competitor and half the perfect partner to those feedback tools.

We focus on simplicity and efficiency which means that every non techie customer can understand how it works within 15 seconds.

Why is it competition? Well because we basically work on the same concept (helping designers get more time to create)

Why is it that complementary ? Because ConceptShare or ProofHQ fit perfectly for exchanges between designers or designers and DAs but might be too much for end customers or people processing lots and lots of picture reviews.

Anyway, cool to e-see you guys !
(you should come to have a coffee in Paris)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys!</p>
<p>First let me say congrats to both @scott and @mat, you have really amazing products guys (and great ways of managing communication, community&#8230;)</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m the cofounder of a small but nice French startup and we are doing UpShot (<a href="http://upshotapp.com" rel="nofollow">http://upshotapp.com</a>).<br />
It&#8217;s kind of half a competitor and half the perfect partner to those feedback tools.</p>
<p>We focus on simplicity and efficiency which means that every non techie customer can understand how it works within 15 seconds.</p>
<p>Why is it competition? Well because we basically work on the same concept (helping designers get more time to create)</p>
<p>Why is it that complementary ? Because ConceptShare or ProofHQ fit perfectly for exchanges between designers or designers and DAs but might be too much for end customers or people processing lots and lots of picture reviews.</p>
<p>Anyway, cool to e-see you guys !<br />
(you should come to have a coffee in Paris)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-23061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-23061</guid>
		<description>Hi, it&#039;s Mat from ProofHQ.

Thanks for the review Andrew and for the comments.

@Scott. Completely agree that moving to tools like this is an evolution for clients. Some jump straight into it and others needs handholding. Once they do jump thought, the productivity gains are great.

Just to clarify, ProofHQ does have workspaces within which proofs can be organised by project/client - in fact any way that you want.  Proofs also have versions, so you can quickly and easily keep track of all revisions of a design, including all comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it&#8217;s Mat from ProofHQ.</p>
<p>Thanks for the review Andrew and for the comments.</p>
<p>@Scott. Completely agree that moving to tools like this is an evolution for clients. Some jump straight into it and others needs handholding. Once they do jump thought, the productivity gains are great.</p>
<p>Just to clarify, ProofHQ does have workspaces within which proofs can be organised by project/client &#8211; in fact any way that you want.  Proofs also have versions, so you can quickly and easily keep track of all revisions of a design, including all comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Houle</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-22357</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Houle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-22357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Donn - Thanks for the feedback! Redmark does have excellent potential, and the fact that it&#039;s free helps a lot. But I agree that ProofHQ has more features and generally feels and works more professionally. I would recommend either product, as it depends on the individual&#039;s needs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donn &#8211; Thanks for the feedback! Redmark does have excellent potential, and the fact that it&#8217;s free helps a lot. But I agree that ProofHQ has more features and generally feels and works more professionally. I would recommend either product, as it depends on the individual&#8217;s needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donn</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-22349</link>
		<dc:creator>Donn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-22349</guid>
		<description>I signed up for a free trial with ProofHQ a while ago after getting a free trial to Redmark here. Although I thought Redmark was very good, ProofHQ seemed to have a bit more functionality.

Although to me everything seems very straightforward, it may not be quite as easy for some of our non web savvy clients who aren&#039;t used to web interfaces. I haven&#039;t really had time to test it out properly yet but I&#039;m impressed with what I&#039;ve seen so far and think it could be a really useful tool.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Donn&#180;s last post was... &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Pixelapes/~3/yTh58RpzYEE/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Increasing your WordPress Security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for a free trial with ProofHQ a while ago after getting a free trial to Redmark here. Although I thought Redmark was very good, ProofHQ seemed to have a bit more functionality.</p>
<p>Although to me everything seems very straightforward, it may not be quite as easy for some of our non web savvy clients who aren&#8217;t used to web interfaces. I haven&#8217;t really had time to test it out properly yet but I&#8217;m impressed with what I&#8217;ve seen so far and think it could be a really useful tool.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Donn&#180;s last post was&#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Pixelapes/~3/yTh58RpzYEE/" rel="nofollow">Increasing your WordPress Security</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-22295</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-22295</guid>
		<description>There are some differences between ConceptShare and ProofHQ. 

Where I see the main point of differentiation is ConceptShare bases the interaction on a workspace. The workspace is the central communications point for an entire project not  just for proof. 

ConceptShare allows users to manage the project and all the visual assets for a project. So if you could imagine that a project, it is never just one piece, there are websites, minisites, iphone apps, banner ads, POP, vehicle wraps, billboards, videos.  With all of the associated visual data that needs to be discussed it becomes a communication nightmare. ConceptShare allows the user to jump in and make the comments and have discussion with others over the visuals. This allows the designers to get the feedback they need to move forward on the designs with out having to chase feedback as the system manages all the notifications. So our approach is more project centric from cocktail napkin sketches to final product. 

I think that these types of tools fix a fundemental problem with the way that we worked this end of the business. I think the less time chasing, interpreting faxed back comments, digesting feedback from multiple project stakeholders is a win for any company. 

The way most companies handle this sort of interaction is based on systems and processes that evolved for the days before computers. The &quot;systems and processes&quot; then transformed to meld with the advances of fax machines and then email. Each time the process changed a little bit to accomodate the new technology but was still rooted in the old logic.  

These new collaboration products allow people to collaborate and communicate over visuals deliver a huge advantage  to companies that choose them.  It is certainly something that will make lives easier for designers, Art and Creative Directors, Marketing Managers, UX designers, and the list goes on. Oh yeah your clients will love them too. 

Cheers 

Scott </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some differences between ConceptShare and ProofHQ. </p>
<p>Where I see the main point of differentiation is ConceptShare bases the interaction on a workspace. The workspace is the central communications point for an entire project not  just for proof. </p>
<p>ConceptShare allows users to manage the project and all the visual assets for a project. So if you could imagine that a project, it is never just one piece, there are websites, minisites, iphone apps, banner ads, POP, vehicle wraps, billboards, videos.  With all of the associated visual data that needs to be discussed it becomes a communication nightmare. ConceptShare allows the user to jump in and make the comments and have discussion with others over the visuals. This allows the designers to get the feedback they need to move forward on the designs with out having to chase feedback as the system manages all the notifications. So our approach is more project centric from cocktail napkin sketches to final product. </p>
<p>I think that these types of tools fix a fundemental problem with the way that we worked this end of the business. I think the less time chasing, interpreting faxed back comments, digesting feedback from multiple project stakeholders is a win for any company. </p>
<p>The way most companies handle this sort of interaction is based on systems and processes that evolved for the days before computers. The &#8220;systems and processes&#8221; then transformed to meld with the advances of fax machines and then email. Each time the process changed a little bit to accomodate the new technology but was still rooted in the old logic.  </p>
<p>These new collaboration products allow people to collaborate and communicate over visuals deliver a huge advantage  to companies that choose them.  It is certainly something that will make lives easier for designers, Art and Creative Directors, Marketing Managers, UX designers, and the list goes on. Oh yeah your clients will love them too. </p>
<p>Cheers </p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Houle</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-22282</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Houle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-22282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Dan - Thanks for the tip. I just checked them out, they look like they offer a very similar service. From the brief time I checked it out, I would suggest it&#039;s just a matter of preference and pricing plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan &#8211; Thanks for the tip. I just checked them out, they look like they offer a very similar service. From the brief time I checked it out, I would suggest it&#8217;s just a matter of preference and pricing plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan V Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.myinkblog.com/a-review-of-proofhq/#comment-22269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan V Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 07:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myinkblog.com/?p=4455#comment-22269</guid>
		<description>Have you ever tried out conceptshare.com? Sounds like it does the exact same thing, was wondering how this compares to it in actual use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever tried out conceptshare.com? Sounds like it does the exact same thing, was wondering how this compares to it in actual use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 549/550 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.myinkblog.com @ 2012-02-11 14:06:45 -->
